A2A Engagement · Readiness Diagnostic · Phased Deployment
This is not a pitch page — it's a working tool. Treasury teams and ALCO leads can run a diagnostic, receive a readiness score across five dimensions, and see exactly what a Phase 1 scoping engagement looks like before committing budget. No ambiguity about what happens next.
Module 01 · Readiness Diagnostic
Enter three data points and receive a live Opportunity Leakage gauge and a five-dimension Readiness Score across ISO 20022 alignment, liquidity model fit, regulatory posture, technical capacity, and corridor economics.
Estimated Annual Nostro Float Drag
Enter volume above to calculate
Five-Dimension Readiness Score
Module 02 · Engagement Roadmap
Each phase ends with a Go/No-Go gate. Budget approvals stay within ALCO norms. Nothing requires a multi-year commitment upfront. Phases are independently approvable and designed to deliver standalone value at each stage.
Use-case validation, jurisdiction scan, and ISO 20022 readiness assessment against your active corridors. Deliverable: board-ready memo and risk register scoped to your balance sheet. Gate: Go/No-Go to Architecture.
DLT platform selection, node topology design, and counterparty onboarding plan. Deliverable: technical design document and RFP criteria for platform vendor engagement. Gate: Go/No-Go to Pilot Budget.
Limited live pilot across 2 corridors. Smart contract configuration, compliance system integration, and operational runbook development. Production-equivalent test environment with full audit trail. Gate: Go/No-Go to Production.
Full corridor deployment, liquidity provisioning strategy, tMMF integration for Nostro yield recovery, and TARGET2/SARIE hook configuration where applicable. Deliverable: live rails and internal handoff kit for operations team.
Phase 1 is the only required commitment. Each subsequent phase is independently approvable. Most ALCO committees can authorize Phase 1 without board sign-off.
Module 04 · Regulatory Clarity
The liability structure, capital treatment, and regulatory perimeter of tokenized deposits are fundamentally different from third-party stablecoins. This panel is for compliance teams and board risk committees who need to understand the distinction before engagement begins.
| Dimension | Tokenized Deposit | Third-Party Stablecoin |
|---|---|---|
| Liability Holder | Issuing bank (you) | Stablecoin issuer (third party) |
| Basel III Capital | Standard deposit treatment | Potentially 1250% risk weight (crypto exposure) |
| Deposit Insurance | Eligible (jurisdiction-dependent) | Not eligible |
| Core System Audit | Native integration path | Requires reconciliation bridge |
| Regulatory Perimeter | Existing banking license | New licensing regime in most jurisdictions |
Same regulatory perimeter your board already understands. Same deposit franchise. The tokenization layer sits inside existing infrastructure, not alongside it.
Module 05 · Begin Engagement
No RFP process, no 6-week scoping discovery call. Phase 1 starts with a 30-minute treasury review to confirm corridor fit and jurisdiction coverage. From there, the memo and risk register take 4–6 weeks.
A 30-minute treasury review to confirm corridor fit, jurisdiction coverage, and ISO readiness posture. The memo and risk register follow within 4–6 weeks. No budget commitment required for Phase 1 initiation.
Compare DLT platforms, corridor economics, and settlement topology before committing to Phase 2. The matrix covers Corda, DAML, Hyperledger Fabric, and hybrid approaches across jurisdiction classes.
If you're evaluating tokenized A2A infrastructure or have a live corridor problem, the fastest path to clarity is a direct conversation. No deck, no discovery call.
[email protected]